Week 5: Response to "Cultural Differences in Concerning Time"

2/5/19

Professor Ivers talked about time and cultural paradigms. He mentioned that some cultures are monochronic, but the majority of the world probably are polychronic. We need to consider that monochronic cultures like to do just one thing at a time and polychronic cultures like to do multiple things at the same time. The United States is monochronic. E. T. Hall (1959) called M-time. He believes that people doing one thing at assumes careful planning and scheduling and is a familiar Western approach that appears in disciplines such as "time management". On the other hand, Polychronic cultures value human interactions over the material things.

In the United States, human interactions are important but no as in the polychronic cultures. For polychronic people, time is seldom experienced as "wasted" and is apt to be considered a point rather than ribbed or road, but that point is often sacred. We can see the differences between relationships and the time in both cultures.

Image result for monochronic vs polychronic time

As an ESL teacher, we need to consider the background of our students, age, English proficiency, education experience, communicative styles, learning styles, and the context and form that they use the time to consider what are the best strategies and activities to them. In other words, we need to consider and implement an intercultural classroom. Low context vs. Higher context culture. We need to consider differences in educational experience because ESL students will use their time differently than in the United States.

It is not about what is the best, it is more about to find the best adaptation to help ESL students to build their strengths to become intercultural. The form that teachers use their time needs to benefit their students.

Comments

Week 2: Response "Is the Great American Teacher Dead?

During this week reading the article "Is the Great American Teacher Dead? Principles to Resurrect Meaningful, Effective and Consciousness Raising Instruction by John J. Ivers professor at Brigham Young University, Idaho, In this article Ivers address some of the issues that teachers have faced and are continuing to face in the classroom. He mentioned that teachers have the mission to make things meaningful. I like the idea because teachers need to be exciting, inspiring, and engaged with their students. I believe that teachers can make a difference. They have the opportunity to help students to think deeply, and feel love for learning or what Ivers said: "Be romantic." We need to put an extra effort. Even though teaching is not always easy, because it brings ups and downs. We have the opportunity to find guidance from our Heavenly Father. We need to pray and teach by the spirit as we find in the scriptures because when we teach by the spirit we can penetrate hear...

Week 6: Response to "Personal Space Differences"

2/14/19 Big love, apparently, is in mutual trust and respect towards each other's personal space -Johnny Deep Professor Ivers talked about Personal space differences. The term generally refers to the physical distance between two people in a social, family, or work environment. In some places, there's hardly any personal space, and in some places, there's a lot of serious implication to not having personal space. According to research conducted by Dr. Holt and her colleague, and reported in the Journal of Neuroscience, part of the neural response to human faces moving towards us -into our personal space - involves the activation of particular neural network - the pariental-frontal network. There is a defined distance in which we are comfortable with the approach of a stranger. when an unfamiliar face passes that comfort zone, the neural signals begin to fire, creating feelings of discomfort, irritability, and anxiety. Debby Mayne gave us 12 general r...

Week 5: Response to "Cultural Paradigms"

1/30/19 I like this quote because it is related to our topic of cultural paradigms. According to Tsiopinis, Nikolaos A. (Nikos, 2005) cultural paradigms are all-embracing 'ways of life' whereby communities are given shape. At the same time, these paradigms remain fluid enough to allow for diffusion and penetration of the "other" and even pollination by the other; what we also call affinity to relate. Thus, individuals can experience the collective validation of living and think with a paradigm that also embraced the truth by others, while contributing to the evolution and expansion of this description of truth. I like the quote in of Elliot Eisner "Not everything that matter can be measured, and not everything that is measured matters. because it is related to our topic of cultural paradigms. Ivers, a professor at BYUI said that"paradigms differ immensely from culture to culture like," people have different ideas and concepts could diff...

TESOL PEDAGOGY II Mrs. Howarth

Search This Blog